This guide is designed for individuals and businesses needing assistance:
The accounting and finance world can be complex and overwhelming. When possible theft, embezzlement, or economic damages come into play, the complexity grows exponentially. Even seasoned accountants don’t have experience digging into the forensic side of the business.
The first reaction of most who are staring at possible loss from fraud is often to speak with an attorney. This is an important first step.
However, it is only one-half of the equation. An attorney will give legal advice, but for them to properly litigate a case they need independent financial data.
This is where the forensic accountant gets involved with the case.
Forensic accounting is a specialty practice where accounting, auditing and investigative skills are used by an accountant. The forensic accountant provides accounting analysis suitable for use in legal proceedings and to quantify damages related to fraud and embezzlement. The forensic accountant also provides technical assistance in matters involving personal injury, lost wages, business disputes, lost profits, divorce, bankruptcy, and more.
Forensic accountants utilize accounting and auditing knowledge to provide litigation support and investigative fraud or embezzlement. Their expertise reviewing internal controls and auditing financial statements make them the ideal professional to investigate financial activities, whether in a business or between individuals.
Forensic accountants usually have a college degree in accounting, economics, or even law. While the breadth of formal education varies, a forensic accountant generally also holds a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) designation. To obtain the CPA designation, an accountant has to take a rigorous 4-part exam that has less than a 50% pass rate.
Additional designations in forensic accounting vary based on the issuing organization. The different forensic accounting designations require about the same amount of fraud training. Below is a list of common forensic accounting designations:
Certified Forensic Accountant (CRFAC) – Issued by the American Board of Forensic Accounting [link]
Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) – Issued by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [link]
Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF) – Issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants [link]
Master Analysist in Financial Forensics (MAFF) – Issued by the National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts [link]
All of these designations require the accountant to have the financial expertise to investigate fraud.
Designations demonstrate the competency of a forensic accountant, but how does experience play into the process?
The forensic accountant needs to have experience with internal control. Almost half of all fraud happens because of a breakdown in internal control. The best way to gain experience in internal controls is through a financial statement auditing background.
When performing a financial statement audit, the auditor must analyze internal control. This background is the foundation of a strong forensic accountant.
The forensic accountant also needs to have an advanced level of accounting knowledge. This experience is obtained from working in the accounting field. Specifically, the public accounting arena. The more exposure the accountant has with various accounting software and concepts, the better they will be in analyzing and tracking down fraudulent transactions.
The forensic accountant also develops experience with each case they investigate. The accountant will list out their experience in previous cases in their Curriculum Vitae (CV). This is the professional resume for a forensic accountant.
It should be noted that the forensic accountant can only list out the cases that went to court. Many times cases will settle before court.
When that happens, the forensic accountant can only generically talk about the case and cannot list it on their CV. Most forensic accountants will list out case studies on their website.
While these cases will be written generically, they give an idea as to the types of cases the accountant has investigated that may not be on their CV.
Finally, the forensic accountant also obtains additional experience through their required continuing education. With the forensic accounting designation comes required yearly classes.
These classes help the accountant strengthen their current skills plus add new concepts in detection.
The investigation process is lengthy, but the methodology developed by the Forensic Accounting Academy © is extremely thorough.
As noted in the above diagram, the investigation process has several steps. Keep this in mind when hiring a forensic accountant.
Forensic accounting firms specialize in forensic accounting and litigation
support. Most firms will conduct embezzlement investigation, and some will have a subset specialty in digital forensics. The firms can be astandalone forensic accounting firm, or a department within a larger public accounting practice. As with any profession if a firm specializes in forensic accounting, they will have more experience and knowledge versus a small public accounting practice that is dabbling in the profession.Regardless of the structure, verify the individuals performing the investigation are either certified in forensic accounting or fraud examinations.
When fraud has been suspected, the question is, who hires the forensic accountant? Generally, an attorney will hire the forensic accountant.
The attorney will need to be apprised as to how the investigation is going so it makes sense for them to do the hiring. The attorney will also incorporate the investigation results into their case.
The attorney will sometimes hire the forensic accountant as a consultant versus an expert. There are several legal intricacies related to this, but the most generic reason is an expert’s work is subject to review by the opposing side.
The consultant’s work is, to a certain extent, protected. Attorneys will initially engage the forensic accountant as a consultant.
When they determine the forensic accountant will need to testify, then they will change the requirements of the engagement. The attorney will then disclose to the court the identification of the expert.
Before an investigation starts, the forensic accountant will perform a conflict of interest inquiry with all parties involved in the case. It is important that the accountant be independent, as any lack of independence will taint even the best investigation.
The accountant should be independent in fact, no financial or personal relationships, and in appearance, any indirect association.
After the conflict of interest has been cleared, the forensic accountant will send out an engagement letter. This letter will clarify what procedures the accountant will perform and the report to be issued.
It is important to note that the accountant will focus strictly on the perceived embezzlement. This is done so all parties are fully aware of what exactly is being completed.
This prevents any assumption on areas the accountant will examine. If additional fraud is discovered, the engagement letter will be amended to disclose the new procedures and tasks to be performed.
The forensic accountant will generally ask for a retainer up front. The amount of the retainer can vary depending on the amount of information, both historical and volume, the accountant must review. Retainers usually range from $2,000 – $10,000 and above.
Rarely will the accountant be able to quote an exact fee for the investigation—there are too many unknown variables.
The more years the suspected fraud has covered, the more information the accountant must review. Billings are typically done by the hour, with the set billing rate quoted in the engagement letter.
The actual billing will either happen as the investigation progresses or as the report is issued. Discuss with the forensic accountant how the billings will work and if the project is small or significant. They can usually tell based off initial discussions.
The forensic accountant will utilize many sources of data, both private and public, as well as many different tools such as data extraction.
At the start of the investigation, the accountant will obtain a large amount of data. As they investigate, they may discover they need more data. This is due to the unknown variables at the beginning of the investigation. Additional requests for more information is common.
When analyzing the data, the accountant will utilize multiple tools and techniques. Common tools used range from data extraction software such as Idea to standard Microsoft Access database.
The main criteria in this analysis is the information needs to be in a usable electronic format. If the information is all hard copy and PDF scans, then the investigation will take considerably longer.
Techniques the accountant will utilize range from gap sequencing to Benford’s Law. There are over 100+ techniques available to a forensic accountant.
The techniques used are dependent on the type of fraud being investigated.
It is important to note the main difference between a financial audit and a forensic investigation. A financial audit is concerned about materiality.
Items under a specific dollar amount are ignored due to immateriality.
In a forensic investigation, there are no materiality thresholds. If an amount is suspect, then it is investigated.
A financial audit will issue a set of financial statements. Typically, a balance sheet, income statement, cash flow, and footnotes.
A forensic investigation will issue a report only on the items investigated not a set of financial statements.
A typical forensic report will have 5 main parts:
Once the report is issued, there can be either a settlement or a trial.
It is not unusual that a settlement is reached after a forensic investigation. If a settlement is reached, then the respective attorneys will negotiate back and forth on the outcome.
At this point the forensic accountant will no longer be involved in the case.
If case is to proceed to trial, then various items will be put into motion.
A trial date will be set. The opposing side with hire an expert to rebut the report.
The original expert will possibly rebut the rebuttal report. Then the forensic accountant will testify at trail. See Chapter 7 for discussion on rebuttals of opposing experts.
Fraud comes in many forms. For most forensic investigations the type of fraud most often investigated is embezzlement.
Per Merriam-Webster, embezzlement is “to appropriate (something, such as property entrusted to one’s care) fraudulently to one’s own use”.
Embezzlement usually revolves around theft of cash from a business, estate, or individual.
When investigating embezzlement, the forensic accountant will first get an idea as to the internal control weaknesses. As mention in Chapter 1, almost half of all fraud happens because of a breakdown in internal controls.
The understanding of the internal controls will assist in identifying the primary suspects and accounts susceptible. Think of this as the low-hanging fruit of an investigation.
Suspects in embezzlement want one particular asset over all others—cash. Because of this, many of the investigation procedures will focus on cash in and cash out of the bank account.
The forensic accountant will always request access to the bank statements, canceled checks, and deposit slips. The reason is accounting records can be manipulated and invoices forged.
However, the original bank statements and the canceled checks will provide support for the flow of funds.
Fraud could happen over several years before being discovered. Because of this, a typical embezzlement case can span several years.
This means that the forensic accountant will need access to the information for all the years possibly affected.
Some historical records won’t be available. Without the records, the forensic accountant cannot investigate. They can only document the years with missing information.
The forensic accountant should never speculate on missing information. All charts, numbers and calculations in their report should be supported with actual documentation.
Embezzlement investigations are the most performed work of a forensic accountant due to their unique skills and expertise in accounting, auditing, and detection.
An area that forensic accountants are called upon is in divorce proceedings.
High income couples typically have assets in multiple investments and personally controlled companies. This tends to lead to one of the spouses hiding income or assets from the other spouse.
The accountant will investigate all personally controlled businesses where income could be hidden. The income can be hidden through distributions recorded as company expenses or income that was never recorded in the business.
The key item is at least one spouse needs to have the ability to control all transactions in the company.
In divorce proceedings, one side will usually have control over much of the information. Request for records will have to go through one attorney to the other.
The production of the records tends to take quite a bit of time, even if there are set deadlines.
Hidden income investigations in divorce proceedings tend to extend out over many months. Not because of the difficulty in investigating the transactions, but because the opposing side will delay sending all information requested.
Forensic accountants assist their clients in bankruptcy proceedings through:
The forensic accountant has expertise in accounting, auditing, and cash flow management. These areas allow the accountant the ability to help analyze transactions and assist the company in identify profitable avenues.
They also help in the financial negotiations with the creditors. This is done in conjunction with the bankruptcy attorney.
The accountant will calculate all the necessary amounts for the creditors, and the attorney will negotiate the actual terms of settlement.
There can be bankruptcy that has occurred due to fraud. The fraud can be all cash siphoned out prior to filing bankruptcy, false statements made to creditors, or false information reported to external entities.
The forensic accountant will investigate the respective source documents related to the possible fraud. The accountant will determine if the fraud ultimately caused the bankruptcy, or if the movement of assets was done to conceal from possible creditors.
The accountant in this situation will be hired by either one of the creditors or, in certain circumstances, the court. No matter who hires them, the forensic accountant will proceed with the investigation like all other investigations.
Economic damages are damages that usually involve wrongful death, personal injury, wrongful termination, or lost profits.
Each of these areas revolve around the notion that but-for the action(s) of another party the affected party would be in different position.
Under economic damages is the concept of ‘but-for’. There are four methods for calculating economic damages under the ‘but-for’ concept.
Generally, these methods focus on:
The forensic accountant will perform several calculations on the available records to determine the amount of lost earnings or lost profit. The accountant will then calculate the total amount back to present value amounts.
Lost profit cases tend to revolve around one individual defaming or interfering with another individual’s business. This then leads to the affected party losing revenue, missing out on discounts on product purchases, or keeping qualified employees, etc.
Ultimately, it is suspected that the actions of the offending party has caused the affected party to be financially impacted.
A wrongful termination case tends to revolve around an employee being terminated and having to find work at lesser pay. It is important that the accountant stay strictly within the financial aspects of the case and not venture into whether the termination was appropriate.
That is for the court or jury to decide.
Regardless of the type of case, the accountant needs to be able to support a future point in time where the affected party is made whole again. This will be a detailed calculation and usually works towards a point in the future.
This future point can be as short as a couple of months or several years. The accountant will need to supply detailed calculations on how they arrived at the future end point.
As noted in previous chapters, an expert witnesses report will always be rebutted from the opposing side. The important item to understand in the rebuttal report is did the opposing expert refute anything in the original report?
A rebuttal report will usually list out deficiencies or questions the original report did not address. Understanding what the rebuttal report is saying is crucial.
For example, assume an original report indicates theft of $1,000,000 cash from a company. Now assume the rebuttal report talks about fixed assets and tax returns, but never specially mentions the $1,000,000 in cash. In this situation, the rebuttal expert has not refuted the $1,000,000 of missing cash.
Sometimes the rebuttal report fails to refute the main issue, especially if the evidence clearly shows the occurrence.
A rebuttal report can find flaws in the original expert’s report. A good rebuttal report will bring up questions or note information in the original report that either changes the original experts report or completely refutes any or all amounts.
Therefore, it is important that any report, whether it is the original report or a rebuttal report, contain supporting documentation and schedules.
Understanding the different aspects of forensic accounting will help individuals and organizations recognize when it is time to bring in an expert.
Approximately one-half of all fraud happens because of weak internal controls.
Consider having a forensic accountant review the internal controls at your organization. A small cost of prevention will guard against the significant cost of an investigation.